Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
Saturday, March 13, 2010
test /tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a4
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a3
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a2
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us -
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a1
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a1
<a href="http://ibuzz.it/user/4" class="url" title="Tim Kokesh (tim)"><span>/</span><span class="fn nickname">tim</span></a> <a href="http://ibuzz.it/user/2" class="url" title="john gotts (johngotts)"><span>/</span><span class="fn nickname">johngotts</span></a> -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a0
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Testing again...:
Post emailed to chum.ly and passed through to Blogspot and Facebook. http://chum.ly/n/a2fae
Post emailed to chum.ly and passed through to Blogspot and Facebook. http://chum.ly/n/a2fae
Monday, March 8, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
/johnwm
OUCH! I wouldn't wanna make that mistake! :(
Retrying the comment now... http://chum.ly/n/9ff22
OUCH! I wouldn't wanna make that mistake! :(
Retrying the comment now... http://chum.ly/n/9ff22
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)