testing subject only from email
http://chum.ly/n/5163ce
Friday, December 17, 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
retest - Chumly as a platform for collaboration
Just a couple of days ago, some of us 'oldtimers' here at www.Chumly.com began sharing stories on how and why we ended up here and why we decided to stay on, eventually forming the team of colleagues and friends that we are today.
One of us - our CIO, Alex - brought back to our attention the fact that 99% of the work we've done to move Chumly from a rather shaky pre-alpha release in january 2010 to the great product we are now able to present, has been done using that very same product.
The alpha - or at least the idea behind it - was so strong that we could use it as our platform for collaboration from day 1. And of course, this platform has evolved side by side with the site itself. We created groups to be able to discuss delicate matters in private. We shared files, documents, screenshots.. You name it, we sent it.
And this is still one of the functions of Chumly that came about pretty much unintentionally. Because we weren't trying to create a site for collaboration on project. Had it been so, we would've probably tried to become Google Wave instead of Chumly. Chumly Wave... ;)
I think what Alex pointed out to us with his mention of the collaborative power of Chumly, was that not even we - the guys and gals behind the curtain - are able to fully grasp the enormous potential of our creation.
From time to time we just stop, look around and say "WOW! I didn't know we could do that!"
I wonder what you would say after spending some time at www.chumly.com?
#chumly #collaboration #sharing
http://chum.ly/n/4f4225
One of us - our CIO, Alex - brought back to our attention the fact that 99% of the work we've done to move Chumly from a rather shaky pre-alpha release in january 2010 to the great product we are now able to present, has been done using that very same product.
The alpha - or at least the idea behind it - was so strong that we could use it as our platform for collaboration from day 1. And of course, this platform has evolved side by side with the site itself. We created groups to be able to discuss delicate matters in private. We shared files, documents, screenshots.. You name it, we sent it.
And this is still one of the functions of Chumly that came about pretty much unintentionally. Because we weren't trying to create a site for collaboration on project. Had it been so, we would've probably tried to become Google Wave instead of Chumly. Chumly Wave... ;)
I think what Alex pointed out to us with his mention of the collaborative power of Chumly, was that not even we - the guys and gals behind the curtain - are able to fully grasp the enormous potential of our creation.
From time to time we just stop, look around and say "WOW! I didn't know we could do that!"
I wonder what you would say after spending some time at www.chumly.com?
#chumly #collaboration #sharing
http://chum.ly/n/4f4225
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
testing again
RT @Jason: CEOs, founders & press ONLY: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora
http://chum.ly/n/4d19fc
http://chum.ly/n/4d19fc
testing
RT @Jason: CEOs, founders & press ONLY: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora
http://chum.ly/n/4d13b7
http://chum.ly/n/4d13b7
CEOs, founders & press ONLY
@Jason: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be8c
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be8c
CEOs, founders & press ONLY
@Jason: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be80
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be80
CEOs, founders & press ONLY
@Jason: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be7f
http://jc.is/fdSJpA
http://ibuzz.cc/n/be7f
CEOs, founders & press ONLY
RT @Jason: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora jc.is/fdSJpA (expand)www.quora.com/CEOs-founders-press-ONLY-Which-tech-...d-why http://ibuzz.cc/n/be7e
CEOs, founders & press ONLY
RT @Jason: Which tech PR person--not firm--do you respect the most and why? - Quora jc.is/fdSJpA http://ibuzz.cc/n/be7b
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
testing special chars via email post
0 @ P ` p
! 1 A Q a q
" 2 B R b r
# 3 C S c s
$ 4 D T d t
% 5 E U e u
& 6 F V f v
' 7 G W g w
( 8 H X h x
) 9 I Y i y
* : J Z j z
+ ; K [ k {
, < L \ l |
- = M ] m }
. > N ^ n ~
/ ? O _ o
€ ˆ ˜ ¨ ° ¸
‰ ‘ ™ ¡ © ± ¹
‚ Š ' š ¢ ª ² º
ƒ ‹" › £ « ³ »
„ Œ" œ ¤ ¬ ´ ¼
... • ¥ - µ ½
† Ž – ž ¦ ® ¶ ¾
‡ — Ÿ § ¯ · ¿
À È Ì Ð Ò × Ù Ý
Á É Í Ñ Ó Ø Ú Þ
Â Ê Î Ô Û ß
Ã Ë Ï Õ Ü
Ä Ö
Å
Æ
Ç
à è ì ð ò ÷ ù ý
á é í ñ ó ø ú þ
â ê î ô û ÿ
ã ë ï õ ü
ä ö
å
æ
ç http://chum.ly/n/4cac6a
*
test
0 @ P ` p
! 1 A Q a q
" 2 B R b r
# 3 C S c s
$ 4 D T d t
% 5 E U e u
& 6 F V f v
' 7 G W g w
( 8 H X h x
) 9 I Y i y
J Z j z
+ ; K [ k {
, < L \ l |
- = M ] m }
. > N ^ n ~
/ ? O _ o
€ ˆ ˜ ¨ ° ¸
‰ ‘ ™ ¡ © ± ¹
‚ Š ' š ¢ ª ² º
ƒ ‹" › £ « ³ »
„ Œ" œ ¤ ¬ ´ ¼
... • ¥ - µ ½
† Ž – ž ¦ ® ¶ ¾
‡ — Ÿ § ¯ · ¿
À È Ì Ð Ò × Ù Ý
Á É Í Ñ Ó Ø Ú Þ
Â Ê Î Ô Û ß
Ã Ë Ï Õ Ü
Ä Ö
Å
Æ
Ç
à è ì ð ò ÷ ù ý
á é í ñ ó ø ú þ
â ê î ô û ÿ
ã ë ï õ ü
ä ö
å
æ
ç http://chum.ly/n/4c410f
0 @ P ` p
! 1 A Q a q
" 2 B R b r
# 3 C S c s
$ 4 D T d t
% 5 E U e u
& 6 F V f v
' 7 G W g w
( 8 H X h x
) 9 I Y i y
J Z j z
+ ; K [ k {
, < L \ l |
- = M ] m }
. > N ^ n ~
/ ? O _ o
€ ˆ ˜ ¨ ° ¸
‰ ‘ ™ ¡ © ± ¹
‚ Š ' š ¢ ª ² º
ƒ ‹" › £ « ³ »
„ Œ" œ ¤ ¬ ´ ¼
... • ¥ - µ ½
† Ž – ž ¦ ® ¶ ¾
‡ — Ÿ § ¯ · ¿
À È Ì Ð Ò × Ù Ý
Á É Í Ñ Ó Ø Ú Þ
Â Ê Î Ô Û ß
Ã Ë Ï Õ Ü
Ä Ö
Å
Æ
Ç
à è ì ð ò ÷ ù ý
á é í ñ ó ø ú þ
â ê î ô û ÿ
ã ë ï õ ü
ä ö
å
æ
ç http://chum.ly/n/4c410f
Friday, December 3, 2010
retest special quote marks conversion
"The biggest mistake I have seen is that people get too lazy with their content posting," he says. "They'll want one main tool to post on all their social media accounts, and I don't think there is one main tool to do that." http://chum.ly/n/4b79bc
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Friday, November 26, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Monday, November 8, 2010
Facebook | Challis Idaho
www.facebook.com/album.php?profile=1&id=125461...78354
testing send to blogspot (avoidance of # in fb url - not a category reference) http://chum.ly/n/432195
testing send to blogspot (avoidance of # in fb url - not a category reference) http://chum.ly/n/432195
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Pluto - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
another example of how science gets created to keep the old mold. [If you allowed Pluto and similar objects to be classified as planets it would throw the whole 'accretion disk' formation of the solar system into question.] http://chum.ly/n/3f7e69
another example of how science gets created to keep the old mold. [If you allowed Pluto and similar objects to be classified as planets it would throw the whole 'accretion disk' formation of the solar system into question.] http://chum.ly/n/3f7e69
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Some of you might have heard about the Fair Tax initiative in the U.S. It has been attempted every year since the late 90's, and was started by some folks in Texas, because it seemed like our present tax system was getting way out of hand. I just received an email from FairTax.org www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer and it happened to contain a picture now running in papers around the U.S. that very clearly explains the concept. (There is a lot of mis-information from detractors who would like to see the current plan kept in place, or who want to use it as a scare tactic to defeat a political opponent. I think that if the word gets out so that people truly understand it, the use as a political weapon will backfire.)
Here is the picture.
(Link)
http://chum.ly/n/3d3a8a
Here is the picture.
http://chum.ly/n/3d3a8a
Saturday, October 16, 2010
What's hot in space? - ComputerworldUK.com
www.computerworlduk.com/slideshow/public-sector/32...space
Here is pretty good visual proof of James McCanney's contention that even planets have comet-like tails, which he explains is evidence of discharging the electrical potential buildup between the sun (net negatively charged) and a positive potential buildup that exists beyond pluto (due to the solar wind). According to McCanney the tail (of comets and other charged bodies moving in the solar system) is actually flowing into the side of the planet/comet opposite the sun, and adds mass, including hydrocarbons and water to the planet/comet, from recombination of elements in the ionized plasma that forms the 'tail'. [His theories about comets have been verified over the years by a number of NASA probes, but they still say that comets are dirty snowballs effervescing in the heat of the sun...
When several planets are 'in alignment', there are direct consequences to the amount of discharge and solar flaring. I wonder if NASA is calling the coming year the Year of the Solar System because they are about to have a coming out party to start 'discovering' what McCanney has held to be 'the way things work' since the 70s. For instance, they might stop saying the comets are dirty snowballs. They might even take the really big step and admit that there are massive electrical affects taking place on the surface of the sun that propagate through the solar system with direct consequences to earth weather. For instance, did you know that there is what McCanney calls the 'August Return Sheet', a location in our solar system through which earth passes during the month of August, where there is a natural discharge flow of positive potential from the outer positive buildup back to the sun.
You can read more about McCanney's theories at jmccanneyscience.com http://chum.ly/n/3be3f7
Here is pretty good visual proof of James McCanney's contention that even planets have comet-like tails, which he explains is evidence of discharging the electrical potential buildup between the sun (net negatively charged) and a positive potential buildup that exists beyond pluto (due to the solar wind). According to McCanney the tail (of comets and other charged bodies moving in the solar system) is actually flowing into the side of the planet/comet opposite the sun, and adds mass, including hydrocarbons and water to the planet/comet, from recombination of elements in the ionized plasma that forms the 'tail'. [His theories about comets have been verified over the years by a number of NASA probes, but they still say that comets are dirty snowballs effervescing in the heat of the sun...
When several planets are 'in alignment', there are direct consequences to the amount of discharge and solar flaring. I wonder if NASA is calling the coming year the Year of the Solar System because they are about to have a coming out party to start 'discovering' what McCanney has held to be 'the way things work' since the 70s. For instance, they might stop saying the comets are dirty snowballs. They might even take the really big step and admit that there are massive electrical affects taking place on the surface of the sun that propagate through the solar system with direct consequences to earth weather. For instance, did you know that there is what McCanney calls the 'August Return Sheet', a location in our solar system through which earth passes during the month of August, where there is a natural discharge flow of positive potential from the outer positive buildup back to the sun.
You can read more about McCanney's theories at jmccanneyscience.com http://chum.ly/n/3be3f7
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
!music
Thanks for that treat from the past, Marc. I don't believe I ever actually saw Brubeck's group play -- just heard the music. But, I did used to wear glasses like that. http://chum.ly/n/3b1ee5
Thanks for that treat from the past, Marc. I don't believe I ever actually saw Brubeck's group play -- just heard the music. But, I did used to wear glasses like that. http://chum.ly/n/3b1ee5
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Good morning all - whatever time of day it is for you.
We've just added a new capability in the 2nd page of user registration and similarly on your Profile settings page; you may now provide links to up to 10 sites or pages that are important to you, and give each of them a title. These will appear near the bottom of your Profile page. Alex and I worked out some of the kinks yesterday, and we thinks it works ok. Try it and give some feedback / opinion. http://chum.ly/n/3b13fb
We've just added a new capability in the 2nd page of user registration and similarly on your Profile settings page; you may now provide links to up to 10 sites or pages that are important to you, and give each of them a title. These will appear near the bottom of your Profile page. Alex and I worked out some of the kinks yesterday, and we thinks it works ok. Try it and give some feedback / opinion. http://chum.ly/n/3b13fb
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
/seoweatherforecast
Hi, seoweather.. and welcome to Chum.ly. If you have any questions about the way things work, just post and one of us here will try to answer.
It looks like you are putting together an interesting weather site with a lot of links to useful weather info, but not quite all plugged in yet. I followed a lot of links but never actually got to any real weather info. Maybe I just chose the wrong links. Or, based on the name of your web site it is an experiment to determine if a lot of links can actually bring that site to the top at search engines. It might work, but getting those backends plugged into tangible weather without making the user take too many hops to find their answer will likely be important. http://chum.ly/n/3b1144
Hi, seoweather.. and welcome to Chum.ly. If you have any questions about the way things work, just post and one of us here will try to answer.
It looks like you are putting together an interesting weather site with a lot of links to useful weather info, but not quite all plugged in yet. I followed a lot of links but never actually got to any real weather info. Maybe I just chose the wrong links. Or, based on the name of your web site it is an experiment to determine if a lot of links can actually bring that site to the top at search engines. It might work, but getting those backends plugged into tangible weather without making the user take too many hops to find their answer will likely be important. http://chum.ly/n/3b1144
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Monday, August 9, 2010
Monday, July 26, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
/marc
I'm baaaack... the reason for changing that page is because we dropped the capability to respond to notices turned up in a search, when we made the page wide. http://chum.ly/n/22fee5
I'm baaaack... the reason for changing that page is because we dropped the capability to respond to notices turned up in a search, when we made the page wide. http://chum.ly/n/22fee5
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
- Hi, Siddharth, and welcome to Chum.ly ! So, i'm curious. Tell us about the implications of 2012 in your handle ;-) http://chum.ly/n/22d96c
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Monday, July 19, 2010
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.CC
testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. testing long notice sent to other sites where notice collapse line overlays target line .. http://ibuzz.cc/n/2cff
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Monday, July 5, 2010
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Kantian Aesthetics and The Information Highway
The official verdict is out. Surfing the web for relevant content or in the hopes of serendipitous content discovery IS an Aesthetic Experience, period. That is, we are looking for information-objects of beauty. The experience of information serendipity is akin to the sublime in art. I explain.
We are hearing more and more being spoken with regard to relevance, content discovery, and the assuagement of one's information needs. We also hear much on the subject of information noise. What is information noise?
Well, we know what noise is. Currently, our definition of information noise is usually UNWANTED INFORMATION, i.e. unwanted information present in your social stream. So in a sense, YOU are NOISE to me.
That is to say, there are Twitter users whose posts I don't like reading: They are not beautiful, hence they are information pollution / information noise. We even speak of "cleaning" one's Twitter Feed.
So we're speaking of an aesthetic experience, and the way I see it, when we speak of cleaning our social stream, or keeping it tidy, we're really speaking about social standing.
What do I mean by this? What I mean is that we're trying to control what kind of information reaches us, partly by cleaning up what digital channels will NOT reach us. We are choosing kinds of information that we do NOT want to see in our social stream.
In a sense, we are also categorizing PEOPLE in terms of Sound information and Noisy information. We are therefore classifying people as being either Good or Not Good (i.e. Good or not Good FOR ME).
So a different kind of filtering is taking place. We're not just talking about information filtering anymore: We're talking about an aesthetic filtering of PEOPLE, because PEOPLE in the end are attached to these Twitter or Facebook or other accounts.
It's normal to want to control one's "listening station", to get the kinds of information we prefer, and none can doubt that surfing the web for information is a matter of taste. But it becomes an aesthetic problem and a very serious ethical debate arises out of it.
How can I judge a human being as being either informative or as being information noise? I can classify INDIVIDUALS as satisfying my information needs or NOT satisfying my information needs. This is horrible, though, the consequences are terrifying. I can dispose of individuals as though they were garbage, and believe me, the effect is felt. You try being rejected as a POOR SOURCE of information. You will be ignored, rejected, put on the Black List, and you will feel alienated.
So for the most part, this kind of "social filtering" of people is really unethical. We speak of our egalitarian society as righteous and virtuous. Yet we classify and label people as good and not good. Noise, in the digital information channel, is bad. It is UGLY. It is a matter of taste, but when taste labels & judges individuals, it becomes a serious ethical problem of VIOLATION and TRANSGRESSION.
Just as a piece of information that satisfies my information need is seen as RELEVANT and BEAUTIFUL, it also transgresses the norm of what is UGLY and NOISY and NOT USEFUL, or NOT INTERESTING. The same goes for the uninteresting, it violates that value we hold so dear, those values indelibly linked to the labelling of our individual experiences of the Information Highway as beautiful, true, and good.
Yes, we are actually seeking the Good, the Beautiful and the True, and are labelling people this way in the process. But an individual is neither good, nor beautiful, nor true, nor is he or she the opposite of this. Humans are just what they are. They can be annoying, but really when one takes offense, one is usually looking to be offensed.
So this, for me, is the final verdict on the experience of surfing the World Wide Web. It is a matter of aesthetics and aesthetic taste, and a seriously unethical matter of FILTERING PEOPLE as objects of knowledge. And so a question arises with regard to the liberal art of Saving-Face: To put it politely, we're looking for social standing, and the judgment of others, as to our aesthetic beauty, goodness, or truth, is profoundly important to us. Services such as Facebook permit us to gauge the responses others have of us, so it works to keep us in check. Like the Liberal Arts in the 17th and 18th century in England, the Liberal Arts serve a public function of promoting the civic virtues. We are doing the same at present: We are using each other to promote civic virtues. Relevance and Utility have become civic virtues, and others can take on the Face-Wasting role of lacking in civility. More to come on the subject of Face-Saving and Face-Wasting (i.e. The Antiface Strategy).
What do you think about this article? Please leave a comment. All comments will receive a formal response from the author. Thank you. #information #noise #pollution #need #behavior #aesthetic #judgment #taste #liberal #arts #antiface #strategy http://ibuzz.it/n/53c8
We are hearing more and more being spoken with regard to relevance, content discovery, and the assuagement of one's information needs. We also hear much on the subject of information noise. What is information noise?
Well, we know what noise is. Currently, our definition of information noise is usually UNWANTED INFORMATION, i.e. unwanted information present in your social stream. So in a sense, YOU are NOISE to me.
That is to say, there are Twitter users whose posts I don't like reading: They are not beautiful, hence they are information pollution / information noise. We even speak of "cleaning" one's Twitter Feed.
So we're speaking of an aesthetic experience, and the way I see it, when we speak of cleaning our social stream, or keeping it tidy, we're really speaking about social standing.
What do I mean by this? What I mean is that we're trying to control what kind of information reaches us, partly by cleaning up what digital channels will NOT reach us. We are choosing kinds of information that we do NOT want to see in our social stream.
In a sense, we are also categorizing PEOPLE in terms of Sound information and Noisy information. We are therefore classifying people as being either Good or Not Good (i.e. Good or not Good FOR ME).
So a different kind of filtering is taking place. We're not just talking about information filtering anymore: We're talking about an aesthetic filtering of PEOPLE, because PEOPLE in the end are attached to these Twitter or Facebook or other accounts.
It's normal to want to control one's "listening station", to get the kinds of information we prefer, and none can doubt that surfing the web for information is a matter of taste. But it becomes an aesthetic problem and a very serious ethical debate arises out of it.
How can I judge a human being as being either informative or as being information noise? I can classify INDIVIDUALS as satisfying my information needs or NOT satisfying my information needs. This is horrible, though, the consequences are terrifying. I can dispose of individuals as though they were garbage, and believe me, the effect is felt. You try being rejected as a POOR SOURCE of information. You will be ignored, rejected, put on the Black List, and you will feel alienated.
So for the most part, this kind of "social filtering" of people is really unethical. We speak of our egalitarian society as righteous and virtuous. Yet we classify and label people as good and not good. Noise, in the digital information channel, is bad. It is UGLY. It is a matter of taste, but when taste labels & judges individuals, it becomes a serious ethical problem of VIOLATION and TRANSGRESSION.
Just as a piece of information that satisfies my information need is seen as RELEVANT and BEAUTIFUL, it also transgresses the norm of what is UGLY and NOISY and NOT USEFUL, or NOT INTERESTING. The same goes for the uninteresting, it violates that value we hold so dear, those values indelibly linked to the labelling of our individual experiences of the Information Highway as beautiful, true, and good.
Yes, we are actually seeking the Good, the Beautiful and the True, and are labelling people this way in the process. But an individual is neither good, nor beautiful, nor true, nor is he or she the opposite of this. Humans are just what they are. They can be annoying, but really when one takes offense, one is usually looking to be offensed.
So this, for me, is the final verdict on the experience of surfing the World Wide Web. It is a matter of aesthetics and aesthetic taste, and a seriously unethical matter of FILTERING PEOPLE as objects of knowledge. And so a question arises with regard to the liberal art of Saving-Face: To put it politely, we're looking for social standing, and the judgment of others, as to our aesthetic beauty, goodness, or truth, is profoundly important to us. Services such as Facebook permit us to gauge the responses others have of us, so it works to keep us in check. Like the Liberal Arts in the 17th and 18th century in England, the Liberal Arts serve a public function of promoting the civic virtues. We are doing the same at present: We are using each other to promote civic virtues. Relevance and Utility have become civic virtues, and others can take on the Face-Wasting role of lacking in civility. More to come on the subject of Face-Saving and Face-Wasting (i.e. The Antiface Strategy).
What do you think about this article? Please leave a comment. All comments will receive a formal response from the author. Thank you. #information #noise #pollution #need #behavior #aesthetic #judgment #taste #liberal #arts #antiface #strategy http://ibuzz.it/n/53c8
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Monday, May 17, 2010
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Monday, April 5, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
/lance -- PS, regarding checkbox behavior: the checkbox 'changes' (by user) are only noticed and retained as changes to session variables - currently - in the My Timeline view... specifically when you click on My Timeline. http://chum.ly/n/c5826
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
Saturday, March 13, 2010
test /tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a4
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a3
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a2
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
/tim /johngotts -- alex - there were a couple things working against us -
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a1
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a1
<a href="http://ibuzz.it/user/4" class="url" title="Tim Kokesh (tim)"><span>/</span><span class="fn nickname">tim</span></a> <a href="http://ibuzz.it/user/2" class="url" title="john gotts (johngotts)"><span>/</span><span class="fn nickname">johngotts</span></a> -- alex - there were a couple things working against us
1) there was a built-in limit test on the count that was overriding anything greater than 200.
2) the query ordering statement was set to DESC (descending by created date) -- so the request would pick our '200' from the most recent ... http://ibuzz.it/n/33a0
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Testing again...:
Post emailed to chum.ly and passed through to Blogspot and Facebook. http://chum.ly/n/a2fae
Post emailed to chum.ly and passed through to Blogspot and Facebook. http://chum.ly/n/a2fae
Monday, March 8, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
/johnwm
OUCH! I wouldn't wanna make that mistake! :(
Retrying the comment now... http://chum.ly/n/9ff22
OUCH! I wouldn't wanna make that mistake! :(
Retrying the comment now... http://chum.ly/n/9ff22
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Friday, February 19, 2010
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
post to blogspot from chum.ly with url https://www.pcsafe.com/download.aspx.. - again.. http://ibuzz.it/n/30ef .
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
post to blogspot from chum.ly with url https://www.pcsafe.com/download.aspx" rel="external" target=\"_blank\">https://www.pcsafe.com/download.
aspx.... http://ibuzz.it/n/30ee .
aspx.... http://ibuzz.it/n/30ee .
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
sending https://www.pcsafe.com/download.aspx" rel="external" target=\"_blank\">https://www.pcsafe.com/download.
aspx.. link to blogspot to see outcome, which might be similar to what kelly saw, since we send the rendered html... http://chum.ly/n/7b35c .
aspx.. link to blogspot to see outcome, which might be similar to what kelly saw, since we send the rendered html... http://chum.ly/n/7b35c .
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Monday, February 8, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
resending ikonixx message with link for test -- Sometimes social media is just too fast. mashable.com/2010/02/08/facebo.... http://chum.ly/n/40ec6 .
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
: making **progress** now
testing saveTags. #test23 #test22
sent to bs again.. http://ibuzz.it/n/1904 .
testing saveTags. #test23 #test22
sent to bs again.. http://ibuzz.it/n/1904 .
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Friday, January 29, 2010
Testing html tag removal
Hello world!
This is a post with a link to pcsafe to see what occurs during tag removal.
We also have some labels for tag conversion.
This is a post with a link to pcsafe to see what occurs during tag removal.
We also have some labels for tag conversion.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
retest current linkback to insure proper handling .. retest current linkback to insure proper handling .. retest current linkback to insure proper handling .. retest current linkback to insure proper handling .... http://ibuzz.it/n/bff .
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
ANNOUNCEMENT: There is a new setting option for Groups. A group admin can now make a group visible to the public by checking the "Public" box in group settings. That permits non-members to view posts on the group's home page... http://chum.ly/n/7958 .
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
: done. However, Help is omitted (by design) from footer menu unless a user is logged in, and even then the user is forced to Join the Help group... So, next step is an option in group setup to permit non-members to view group's home page... http://chum.ly/n/6ba8 .
Monday, January 11, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
ALERT: We have reset all user Email Notification Options. These were defaulted ON during registration, which was a bad choice on our part. If you want notifications when followed, messaged or receive an @post, re-check the option in Email Settings... http://chum.ly/n/20df .
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Blogspot news update: It appears the block sending to some blogspot accounts is strictly a block using their API. It also appears that the affected accounts must get verbal approval from blogspot support to remove the block... And, as mentioned, this is as far as I can see totally unpublished... http://chum.ly/n/1e83 .
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
final attachment test ibuzz.it/attachment/29?ext=gif.. http://ibuzz.it/n/4cf .
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
another attachmenttest ibuzz.it/attachment/28?ext=gif.. http://ibuzz.it/n/4ce .
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
yet another attach test ibuzz.it/attachment/25?ext=gif.. http://ibuzz.it/n/4cb .
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
nother test with attachment to remote sites ibuzz.it/attachment/24?ext=jpeg.. http://ibuzz.it/n/4ca .
Post from johnwm at IBUZZ.IT
new notice w/ attachment to test link at tw etc. ibuzz.it/attachment/23?ext=gif.. http://ibuzz.it/n/4c9 .
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Post from johnwm at CHUM.LY
Tim - I will address the need for html_entity_decode after supper, and then turn to your other api requirements. [chum.ly]
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)