www.computerworlduk.com/slideshow/public-sector/32...space
Here is pretty good visual proof of James McCanney's contention that even planets have comet-like tails, which he explains is evidence of discharging the electrical potential buildup between the sun (net negatively charged) and a positive potential buildup that exists beyond pluto (due to the solar wind). According to McCanney the tail (of comets and other charged bodies moving in the solar system) is actually flowing into the side of the planet/comet opposite the sun, and adds mass, including hydrocarbons and water to the planet/comet, from recombination of elements in the ionized plasma that forms the 'tail'. [His theories about comets have been verified over the years by a number of NASA probes, but they still say that comets are dirty snowballs effervescing in the heat of the sun...
When several planets are 'in alignment', there are direct consequences to the amount of discharge and solar flaring. I wonder if NASA is calling the coming year the Year of the Solar System because they are about to have a coming out party to start 'discovering' what McCanney has held to be 'the way things work' since the 70s. For instance, they might stop saying the comets are dirty snowballs. They might even take the really big step and admit that there are massive electrical affects taking place on the surface of the sun that propagate through the solar system with direct consequences to earth weather. For instance, did you know that there is what McCanney calls the 'August Return Sheet', a location in our solar system through which earth passes during the month of August, where there is a natural discharge flow of positive potential from the outer positive buildup back to the sun.
You can read more about McCanney's theories at jmccanneyscience.com http://chum.ly/n/3be3f7
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is a followup observation on my post about mercury's comet tail, and more on James McCanney's view of how solar systems work.
ReplyDeleteIf you think about a large comet or asteroid entering our solar system and flying near enough to a planet to be trapped in the planet's gravitational field, then it seems reasonable that a new moon could come into existence -- if that space traveler was big enough to hold its own against the tug of the planet.
And if you extend that analogy to really big (by our standards) objects entering our solar system (like the planets Mercury or Venus), they might end up orbiting the sun in a similar sort of capture.
The only problem with this highly reasonable theory about how a star-centered system can take on new members is that it goes against one of the 'laws' of the astronomical community about how stars and solar systems materialize 'all at once'... even though that law is really only a theory, and nobody has ever seen it occur first hand. It is a bit like the notion that comets are just big ice balls and the tails are just water vapor leaving the ice, which has now been seen first hand by NASA probes to be not the case. The text books on these subjects have been printed and taught like the gospel truth, and it is pretty hard to say 'oops - we got that one wrong'. http://chum.ly/n/3c2596